Direction C
Does it work
Nothing here is settled. When the family meets to decide, anyone who disagrees with a verdict says so and we change it.
The four questions it has to answer
Does a club actually want this?
Passes The best-evidenced of the four questions here. The pains are the volunteers' own words rather than our guesses: boxes in his living room, packs made up by hand, a replacement that takes weeks, a batch that can come out worse than the sample the club signed off.
Clubs that buy the cheapest deal every year name exactly these as the reason, and this direction takes the admin, the risk and the waiting off the club with one order page and one delivery day.
Whether somebody already does it has now been checked across all six markets EKANA competes in: in Spain, Britain, Germany, Ireland, Italy and Portugal, no football kit supplier found collects sizes itself, bags a named pack per child, delivers a whole club in one day, or holds that club's spares locally — every one sells kit the way a shop does, one family's order at a time.
The closest real match anywhere is a school-uniform maker in the Gulf that measures pupils on site and sorts delivery by name, which shows the idea works, just never yet for a football club.
Objection to expect
It is a better service, not a new product, and the German makers already sell speed. The answer is that nobody sells the volunteer his year back. The honest limit: Italy and Portugal are covered by named suppliers and their own homepages, not by the page-by-page reading Spain got, because the search tools failed the same way twice. The strongest match found anywhere, a school-uniform maker in the United Arab Emirates who measures pupils itself and sorts delivery by name, shows the pieces of this idea work in a real business — just never yet for a football club, and not in a market EKANA sells into.
Would enough clubs pay this price?
Passes The safest of the four: the pack stays at EKANA's price today, the cheapest custom kit a club in Madrid can buy. Nothing here is protected from being copied, and where nothing protects an offer the sensible place to price is low, which is where the price already is.
The comparison a parent makes is with what the club store charged last year: the same money, and now a named pack on one day and a replacement in days. The print shops and the German makers are cheaper for one shirt, and they sell a shirt, not a club's season.
Objection to expect
The German online makers are cheaper still for single pieces. They sell a shirt, not a club's season; a captain of a five-a-side team is their buyer, a club with an academy is ours.
Can we make it at that price and still earn?
Passes Yes, and it turns on three things, each of which costs less than it looks. The name goes on the bag, not into the shirt: that costs a printed label, every garment inside a size stays identical, a wrong size is a swap rather than a remake, and any unit in the spares box fits any child. Put the name in the garment and all three reverse at once.
The pack is not new work in the world: garments already come out of a run bagged, so what changes is what goes in and the order it is stacked in, which is the sort the volunteer does by hand in his living room today, moved to the factory and done against a size list we hold because we collected it.
The spares box is cheaper than what it prevents: a spare bought with the batch is an ordinary unit, while the mid-season reorder it saves is a small run, the most expensive way anything gets made.
The box is there for growth rather than loss, because children between six and fourteen grow through a size in a season, so it is weighted to the sizes they grow into; and a leftover is only lost if the design changes, which the deal fixes for its term. So the box is run down in a design's last season rather than topped up.
Objection to expect
Spares that go unused at season end are dead stock in our hands rather than the club's. That only holds if one of the three rules breaks: the name on the bag, the box weighted to growth, the box run down in a design's last season. One limit the club should hear first: the box can only replace a garment carrying nothing personal, because sublimation dyes a name or a number into the cloth, so anything carrying one is a remake at the factory's normal weeks. The one number reasoning cannot reach is how many spares a real club uses in a season; the first season's count sets the size of the box after that.
What would stop a club saying yes?
Passes Nobody has to learn anything. The volunteer gives up his phone list for an order page and a delivery day, which is less work than he does now. The president signs off a design and a date. Families see a sample before they pay. The factory is asked for a few extra units and for bags with names on them, a small ask to a partner we already use.
The honest hurdle is habit: a volunteer may simply prefer the method he knows, and the only way to find out is to run one club's season and ask him afterwards what he had to chase.
Objection to expect
The volunteer may prefer the method he knows. The test is one club's season run end to end, and his own account afterwards.
Price and cost
Price position relative to the market
Three things we make every idea pass
- Clearly different. On the pack per child with one delivery, where every group is flat; not on speed alone, where the German makers and the print shops compete.
- The difference rests on the combination and on the spares box in Madrid, which no supplier keeps for a club.
- Several problems at once. The guess, the boxes, the hand-made packs, the March replacement and the pay-before-you-see risk, with one order page and one delivery.
- Simple for five clubs. One box of sizes, one order page, one delivery day and one spares box per club is a routine, not a build; five clubs is five shelves and five delivery days.
Does it contradict itself
None found The highest promise is nothing to chase, and what delivers it is a pack made at the factory, a delivery day and a spares box, all of which exist with the production we have.
An earlier idea for this direction promised shirts printed in a day from stock that had never been costed; that promise is not made here, so the contradiction it carried is gone. What remains is a limit, stated on the page: the spares box is finite.
What it needs from us
Nader sets the spares allowance with each club, agrees the packing with the factory and runs the delivery day. Karim builds the order page once. Carolina designs the kit and the sample. No new hire.
Where the idea came from, and what we would do next
The ideas that went into this direction
- Narrowing the catalogue is the cheapest reduce on the list and it keeps the spares box small.
- Fewer styles and colourways on standard templates, without narrowing the product types a club needs from one vendor.
- Pack-and-pickup: families order and pay by a deadline, every pack arrives made up per child in one delivery, and families collect on the first training day.
- The teams that buy grudgingly or go to print shops are the pool this direction serves.
- The parents already pay but were never designed for; the pack and the sample first are their offer.
- Coaches' kit rides in the same delivery as a pack like any other.
- Seeing it finished before paying, with the club holding a produced sample before it pays, is kept; producing from blank stock is not.
- The local printing idea is replaced by a spares box held in Madrid.
- The German makers sell speed too, and the difference is the pack and the proof, which is why the promise is ease, not speed.
- Running one club's packs end to end is the test, and it no longer waits on a local printing model being costed.
- Building for the reluctant and the grudging buyers: fix the wait, the reorders, the admin and the minimums.
Ideas it leaves out, and why
- Local finishing in Madrid: stock arrives already sublimated, and a step such as names and numbers is added here. The estimate that rejected this costed a different idea, blank garments printed here from scratch, not what Karim described. His version has never been costed. This direction does not wait for it, and it stays an open question rather than a closed one.
- A storefront where the club never buys stock and every sale pays the club a cut. Every channel already runs this; the order page is brought to that standard and claims no difference for it.
- A discount next season for returning old kit for recycling. Nobody has checked whether recyclers in Spain pay or charge, and collecting kit from hundreds of homes is logistics we do not have.
What we would test with real clubs before committing
The spares allowance, costed
- Who
- Nader, with the factory and one club's last two seasons of orders.
- What we ask
- What a few extra units per size add to a club's batch, what it costs to bag per child at the factory, and how many spares that club would have used last season.
- When
- Before the first pack is offered.
- What we would learn
- A per-pack figure for the allowance and the packing, against last season's actual replacements and late registrations.
One club's season, end to end
- Who
- One club Nader already contacts, run through its actual volunteer.
- What we ask
- Run the whole season pack through sizes-once, the order page, the sample first, one delivery day and the spares box, and ask the volunteer afterwards what he chased.
- When
- The coming season, once the allowance is costed.
- What we would learn
- Packs collected on the day, replacements served from the box, and the volunteer's own account that he chased nothing.
Local finishing, costed against what Karim actually described
- Who
- Nader, with the factory.
- What we ask
- What it costs to hold stock that arrives already sublimated and finish it here (names, numbers) against the spares-box model this direction now uses. The earlier rejection was costed on blank garments printed here from scratch, which is not the idea Karim described.
- When
- Only if anyone wants to reopen the question; this direction does not wait for it.
- What we would learn
- A real cost for the version Karim actually meant, not the version that was costed and rejected.
Italy and Portugal, read to the depth Spain got
- Who
- Karim, against the suppliers already named there — MY CLUB GROUP, Legea, Teefactory, GSPORT and the rest.
- What we ask
- Read them page by page rather than by homepage, the way the Spanish suppliers were read; the search tools failed before that depth was reached, twice.
- When
- Before the family meets to decide, if the gap still matters by then.
- What we would learn
- Either a named example that ends this direction, or the ground made as clear as Spain's.